Outcome measures used in forensic mental health research: a structured review.

Chambers JC.; Yiend J.; Barrett B.; Burns T.; Doll H.; Fazel S.; Jenkinson C.; Kaur A.; Knapp M.; Plugge E.

Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Outcome measures used in forensic mental health research: a structured review.

Chambers JC., Yiend J., Barrett B., Burns T., Doll H., Fazel S., Jenkinson C., Kaur A., Knapp M., Plugge E.

The evidence base for forensic mental health (FMH) services has been developing since the late 1990s. Are outcome measures sound enough for the evaluation tasks?

Original publication

DOI

10.1002/cbm.724

Type

Journal article

Journal

Crim Behav Ment Health

Publication Date

2009

Volume

Pages

9 - 27

Addresses

Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, UK.

Keywords

Commitment of Mentally Ill, Evidence-Based Medicine, Forensic Psychiatry, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Humans, Mental Disorders, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Prisoners