Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Patients whose symptoms are 'unexplained by disease' often have a poor symptomatic outcome after specialist consultation, but we know little about which patient factors predict this. We therefore aimed to determine predictors of poor subjective outcome for new neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease 1 year after the initial consultation. METHOD: The Scottish Neurological Symptom Study was a 1-year prospective cohort study of patients referred to secondary care National Health Service neurology clinics in Scotland (UK). Patients were included if the neurologist rated their symptoms as 'not at all' or only 'somewhat explained' by organic disease. Patient-rated change in health was rated on a five-point Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) scale ('much better' to 'much worse') 1 year later. RESULTS: The 12-month outcome data were available on 716 of 1144 patients (63%). Poor outcome on the CGI ('unchanged', 'worse' or 'much worse') was reported by 482 (67%) out of 716 patients. The only strong independent baseline predictors were patients' beliefs [expectation of non-recovery (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.96), non-attribution of symptoms to psychological factors (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.51-3.26)] and the receipt of illness-related financial benefits (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.37-3.86). Together, these factors predicted 13% of the variance in outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients, two-thirds had a poor outcome at 1 year. Illness beliefs and financial benefits are more useful in predicting poor outcome than the number of symptoms, disability and distress

Type

Journal article

Journal

Psychol.Med.

Publication Date

04/2010

Volume

40

Pages

689 - 698

Keywords

Adult, Attitude to Health, belief, beliefs, benefits, care, Central Nervous System Diseases, CGI, CLINICAL, clinics, Cohort Studies, cohort study, consultation, culture, diagnosis, Diagnosis,Differential, disability, disease, distress, epidemiology, factors, Female, HAD, health, Humans, illness, illness belief, illness beliefs, Male, Medicine, Multicenter Studies, neurology, Odds Ratio, organic, outcome, outpatient, Outpatients, patient, Patients, Predictive Value of Tests, predictors, prospective, Prospective Studies, psychological, psychological medicine, research, Research Support, scale, school, Scotland, secondary, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors, symptom, symptoms, therapy, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, uk, Universities, Young Adult