Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A new review, launched by the Department for Health and Social Care and Led by NIHR ARC OxTV supported Dr Ben Goldacre, will focus on the more efficient and safe use of health data for research and analysis for the benefit of patients and the healthcare sector.

Profile picture of Dr Ben Goldacre

The review will complement the forthcoming national Data Strategy for Health and Social Care which will set the direction for the use of data in a post-pandemic healthcare system.

The UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has asked Dr Ben Goldacre, who is supported by ARC OxTV through it's Digital Health research theme,  to undertake this rapid review and report his findings in April 2021

Rt Hon. Matt Hancock MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, said: “Ensuring that researchers have ethical, secure and transparent access to health data has the potential to transform health and care.

“Ben has a wealth of experience in working with health data and I am delighted that he has accepted my invitation to undertake this review. I am looking forward to hearing his recommendations over the coming months.”

Dr Ben Goldacre, Director of The DataLab in the University of Oxford's Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, said: “The UK has a phenomenal resource in its raw data, and its people. Our challenge is now in the final lap: we need to find safe, secure, collaborative and efficient ways to turn that raw data into insights and action, to improve patient care for all. There is a wealth of expertise around the country, much of it untapped. I’m excited to talk to people across health, social care and research about their experiences and concerns to help drive better, broader, safe use of health data. ”

If you would like to get in touch about the review or share your experience of using health data for research, please contact goldacrereview@dhsc.gov.uk

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE REVIEW

  1. How do we facilitate access to NHS data by researchers, commissioners, and innovators, while preserving patient privacy?
  2. What types of technical platforms, trusted research environments, and data flows are the most efficient, and safe, for which common analytic tasks?
  3. How do we overcome the technical and cultural barriers to achieving this goal, and how can they be rapidly overcome?
  4. Where (with appropriate sensitivity) have current approaches been successful, and where have they struggled?
  5. How do we avoid unhelpful monopolies being asserted over data access for analysis?
  6. What are the right responsibilities and expectations on open and transparent sharing of data and code for arm’s length bodies, clinicians, researchers, research funders, electronic health records and other software vendors, providers of medical services, and innovators? And how do we ensure these are met?
  7. How can we best incentivise and resource practically useful data science by the public and private sectors? What roles must the state perform, and which are best delivered through a mixed economy? How can we ensure true delivery is rewarded?
  8. How significantly do the issues of data quality, completeness, and harmonisation across the system affect the range of research uses of the data available from health and social care? Given the current quality issues, what research is the UK optimally placed to support now, and what changes would be needed to optimise our position in the next 3 years?
  9. If data is made available for secondary research, for example to a company developing new treatments, then how can we prove to patients that privacy is preserved, beyond simple reassurance?
  10. How can data curation best be delivered, cost effectively, to meet these researchers’ needs? We will ensure alignment with Science Research and Evidence (SRE) research priorities and Office for Life Sciences (OLS) (including the data curation programme bid).
  11. What can we take from the successes and best practice in data science, commercial, and open source software development communities?
  12. How do we help the NHS to analyse and use data routinely to improve quality, safety and efficiency?

Similar stories

Cathy Creswell Elected Fellow of Academy of Medical Sciences

Cathy Creswell, ARC OxTV Theme lead, Professor of Developmental Clinical Psychology, Departments of Psychiatry and Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, has been elected a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences.

Self-monitoring of blood pressure does not result in the earlier detection of high blood pressure in pregnancy nor does it improve blood pressure control in those with pregnancy hypertension

Self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy neither results in earlier detection of high blood pressure, nor helps with blood pressure control in those who are pregnant, suggest the results of two new papers based on research from researchers supported by the NIHR ARC OxTV at the University of Oxford and King’s College London.

Excess weight in childhood has significant short- and long-term economic costs

Researchers from Oxford Population Health’s Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) and supported by the NIHR ARC OxTV, have recently published a comprehensive review of the evidence on the economic impacts of childhood excess weight. The results, published in the journal Children, highlight both the significant economic impacts of overweight and obesity in children, and the priority areas for future research.

New study: can a pioneering online programme help parents reduce anxiety in young children?

Oxford Population Health researchers, in part supported by the ARC OxTV, are leading a cost-effectiveness analysis of a new online, parent-led intervention for young children at risk of anxiety disorders.

Three out of four people with heart failure could be diagnosed sooner, potentially improving quality of life and reducing costs to the healthcare system

Researchers from the University of Oxford have today reported that only 1 in 4 people diagnosed with heart failure received a simple, recommended blood test that could have resulted in an earlier diagnosis at a more treatable stage.

Arm and shoulder disability and pain after breast cancer surgery reduced by exercise

The debilitating arm and shoulder disability and pain that some women who have had breast cancer surgery experience as a side effect of their surgery can be reduced by following a physiotherapy-led exercise programme after their operation, a new study has found.